|
Wet AMD can be treated with laser photocoagulation, photodynamic
therapy, intravitreal injections or a combination of these. The
aim of treatment is to slow the rate of vision decrease or stop
further vision loss but the disease some times may progress despite
treatment. With the advent of anti-VEGF treatment there are greater
numbers of patients who are showing visual improvement.
Laser
photocoagulation
This out patient procedure uses the conventional laser to destroy
fragile, leaking blood vessels. A high energy beam of light aimed
directly on the new blood vessels, destroys and inactivates them,
preventing further loss of vision. However, laser treatment may
also destroy some surrounding healthy tissue. Only a small percentage
of patients where the membrane is away from the centre (fovea) can
be treated by this modality. Re-treatments may be necessary. Recently
in some cases we combine it with an anti-VEGF agent so as to decrease
the chances of recurrence.
Photodynamic
Therapy (PDT)
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been found to be an effective treatment
for patient for patients with new vessels (choroidal neovascular
membrane or CNVM) secondary to AMD, myopia, etc. It reduces the
risk of moderate and severe vision loss. A light stimulated drug
called Verteporfin is injected intravenously. It travels through
out the body including the new vessels in the eye. The drug tends
to "stick" to the surface of new blood vessels. Next a low intensity
laser beam (689nm) is directed into the eye for about 83 seconds
to activate the drug. The activated drug selectively destroys the
abnormal blood vessels without damage to surrounding healthy tissue.
Because the drug is activated by light the patient must avoid exposure
of skin or eyes to direct sunlight or bright indoor light for 5
days after treatment. The treatment is relatively painless and no
major side effects have been reported. PDT slows the rate of vision
loss. Re-treatment may be required but usually not before 3 months.
Intravitreal
Injections (Anti-VEGF Agents)
Abnormally high levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
occur in eyes with wet AMD which promotes the growth of abnormal
new blood vessels. Anti-VEGF agents block the effects of this growth
factor. Treatment by this agent helps slow down vision loss from
AMD and in some case improves vision. Multiple injections are often
required for complete inactivation of the disease process.
Avastin (Bevacizumab) is an anti-VEGF agent approved for
use in colorectal cancer. Ophthalmologists are using it "off label"
in AMD and other vascular conditions for its anti-angiogenic property.
When used in the eye as an intravitreal injection its dose is miniscule
and risk of adverse systemic reactions like gastrointestinal perforation,
thrombo-embolic reactions, hypertension and proteinuria is negligible.
There are no formal clinical trials with Avastin but recent experience
with this drug has been encouraging with most patients getting stabilized
and some improving.
Macugen (Pegaptanib Sodium) is the first selective VEGF
inhibitor which the FDA approved to treat the pathologic process
underlying all subtypes of neovascular AMD. In clinical studies
Macugen was given every 6 weeks for upto two years and was found
to preserve visual acuity of all subtypes of neovascular AMD. Its
advantage lies in its selective systemic inhibition of VEGF, thereby
making it possible for use in patients with recent cardiac history.
Lucentis (Ranibizumab) is a recently FDA approved anti-VEGF
agent that neutralizes all active forms of vascular endothelial
growth factor. It is a recombinant homogenized monoclonal antibody.
Clinical trials with Lucentis have shown not only stabilization
but also improvement in visual acuity. In the multicentre trial
comparing effectivity of Lucentis to sham injection for minimally
classic or occult CNVM, it was found that 94.5% of the group given
0.3 mg and 94.6 % of those given 0.5mg had stable vision compared
with 62.2 % of those receiving the sham injection. Visual acuity
improved in 24.8 % of the 0.3 mg group and 33.8% of 0.5 mg group
as compared with 5% of the sham injection group. The benefit in
visual acuity was maintained at 24 months. Lucentis was also found
to be superior to Vertporfin (Photodynamic therapy) in predominantly
classic neovascular age related macular degeneration with low rates
of serious ocular adverse effects.
Triamcinolone is a slow releasing steroid preparation which
helps in reducing the swelling associated with the disease and also
has some anti-angiogenic action. The risk of increased intraocular
pressure is its major disadvantage. Since it is a suspension it
is visible as a floater in the upper field of vision for a few weeks
after injection.
Intravitreal injections are given with aseptic precautions in an
operation theatre. The eye is numbed with anesthetic drops and then
the injection is given. The procedure is relatively atraumatic but
carries a small risk of post injection infection, raised or low
intraocular pressure, cataract formation, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal
detachment. Systemically anti-VEGF agents are to be used with caution
in patients with a recent history of cardiac ailment, uncontrolled
hypertension and severe proteinuria.
Combination Therapy
Treatment of wet ARMD with Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) alone has
very limited chances of visual improvement while anti-VEGF agents
have the problem associated with repeated injections. Combination
therapy of PDT with anti-VEGF agents or Triamcinolone makes the
treatment more finite, with the advantage of improvement in visual
acuity in some cases and reduced requirement for repeated injections
Transpupillary Thermotherapy (TTT)
In TTT, a large spot of diode laser (810 nm) with relatively low
energy is applied to the area of new vessels. The treatment is non
specific and there is concomitant damage to normal retinal tissue
though less then in conventional laser photocoagulation.
Surgical Treatment
The following surgical procedures have been tried but with limited
benefit:
Excision of Subfoveal CNVM - The technique for this has
been fairly well perfected but visual recovery is limited by the
fact that normal retinal pigment epithelial cells are also removed
in the process.
Macular Translocation - In this procedure the retina is
detached to be able to shift the fovea away from the subfoveal choroidal
neovascular membrane. Thereafter the membrane is lasered without
damaging the fovea. Drawbacks of this procedure are a high complication
rate, inadequate shift of macula, formation of retinal folds and
double vision.
|